[Vaccination-Liberation] Religious Exemptions from vaccination requirements

As knowledgeable 'vaccine-aware' Californians learned last year, the religious exemption is being eliminated. Increasingly we are seeing parents who are protecting their children from toxic vaccines being villainized.

This move is well funded and the groundwork has been put in place to convince legislators that they have the legal authority to eliminate religious exemptions.

Before anyone pursues legal action based on Constitutional rights (or pays any lawyer), please review what the CDC is telling its employees as well as state legislators:

From CDC Chapter 13 (pg 273)
Vaccination Mandates: The Public Health Imperative and Individual Rights
KEVIN M. MALONE AND ALAN R. HINMAN

LEGAL AUTHORITIES—CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS OF MANDATORY VACCINATION

Parens Patriae

Further authority to compel vaccination of children comes under the doctrine of parens patriae in which the state asserts authority over child welfare. In the 1944 case of Prince v. Massachusetts, which involved child labor under an asserted right of religious freedom, the U.S. Supreme Court summarized the doctrine, noting that:”Neither rights of religion nor rights of parenthood are beyond limitation. Acting to guard the general interest in youth’s well being, the state as parens patriae may restrict the parent’s control by requiring school attendance, regulating or prohibiting the child’s labor, and in many other ways. Its authority is not nullified merely because the parent grounds his claim to control the child’s course of conduct on religion or conscience.

Thus, he cannot claim freedom from compulsory vaccination for the child more than for himself on religious  grounds. The right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to ill health or death. (321 U.S. at 166–7, 64 S.Ct. at 442)”

We are going to have to move away from the religious "choice" debate. It is going to become a losing argument - as it has in California. . .

It is hard to understand why there are attorneys who don't acknowledge the Prince vs Massachusetts Supreme Court decision of 1944.

It is hard to understand why there are attorneys who don't acknowledge the fact that the Supreme Court has refused to revisit this issue.

Before signing a contract with a BAR attorney (or giving him or her any money) to "defend your religious or parental rights not to vaccinate", ask him or her how he or she plans to overcome the Supreme Court's position. Unless he or she is willing to give you a money back guarantee, it would be wise to reconsider hiring him or her.

Before our corrupt 'agencies' embark on new policies, they usually lay the groundwork years in advance. In 2009 I discovered when and how they established new 'pandemic' public health policies in Ohio (and other states). As is most often the case, there was a federal grant involved and it all took place without the knowledge or consent of the general public.

STATE OF OHIO's Model State Emergency Health Powers Act.

During my pandemic research, I also discovered that before instituting new policies - that might be met with resistance - 'agencies' hire attorneys to review and define the "legal authority" needed to implement their programs. See: Limitation of Movement - Legal

Generally speaking by the time new policies are inflicted on us, the groundwork needed to enforce them has been in place for years.Much goes on behind the scenes that the public (including attorneys) are completely unaware of.

If we are to protect our children (and/or ourselves) from the vaccination agenda, we are going to have to look beyond the current constraints of our embedded medical and legal systems and start thinking 'out of the BAR box'!.

Best,

AL Whitney

Retired Registered Respiratory Therapist
Former Court Appointed Special Advocate for children
Wife of a retired Family Practitioner

In Defense of Humanity - RBN weekly program

AntiCorruption Society
Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines

People for Safe Technologies

Are You Eating This Substance That Lines Food Industry Pockets?

Cellulose... This damn crap that is rampant and put in all of our supplements too.  Mostly in those veggie caps, which is now WHY I buy in bulk and put in the old fashioned gelatin caps.

Supplement companies do it to cut corners, just like they do when they add all the fake B-12 cyanocobalamin, instead of doing the right thing and using the pre-methylated form of METHYLCOBALAMIN.

If you have supplements in callulose capsules, empty them out into GELATIN capsules and then switch to a company that never uses cellulose.

Remember this post where I was bitching about the Platinum Plus Amino Acids being ruined by this shit.
http://messiahmews.blogspot.com/2016/05/i-am-disappoint.html

It's also why some supplements never seem to work.





Cellulose (a.k.a. Wood Pulp) 101

* Cellulose can be called by these different names on the ingredients label: Carboxymethyl cellulose, Microcrystalline Cellulose, or MCC, and Cellulose Gum.
* Cellulose is much cheaper to obtain from wood, than real food ingredients and is manipulated in a laboratory to form different structures (liquid, powder, etc) depending upon the food product it is used in.
* The most economical choice for cellulose comes from wood by-products, however cellulose can also come from vegetables, but will be listed on the label as such.
* The cellulose wood pulp industry is at it’s all time high (up 8% from 2009-2011).
Humans cannot digest cellulose. It has no caloric value. The food industry tricks consumers who eat foods with a high cellulose content to feel full physically and psychologically without having consumed many calories.
* According to the FDA: “In humans, virtually 100 percent of orally ingested cellulose can be recovered in the feces within four days, indicating that absorption does not occur.” This substance just passes through your body, while lining food industry pockets. Nice!
* The FDA sets no limit on cellulose content in processed food, however sets a limit for meat products at 3.5%.
* Cellulose can by used as a supplement to bulk up foods with fake fiber. Next time you see “added fiber” on the label, take a look at the ingredients, it usually contains cellulose.
* The gelling action of cellulose when combined with water creates an emulsion, suspending ingredients, making processed food products creamier and thicker than they would be otherwise.
* Cellulose can absorb water and is used as an “anti-caking” agent in shredded and grated cheeses, spice mixes, and powdered drink mixes.

Never let the food industry trick you with this cheap and harmful substance. Next time you see your family or friends eating the popular products discussed in this video – ask them:

“Do You Eat Wood?”
Remember to always check the ingredients list before buying anything at the grocery store – even organic products for cellulose and other emulsifiers like Polysorbate 80. Shred your own cheese, buy 100% maple syrup and forget fast food. 

Remember... They have to get this shit into us to use as building blocks for the nano-tech, biofilm, and Morgellon's conditions.

Start boycotting any and all companies that use this.