Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Obamacare Page 1,004: You Must Have RFID Chip Implanted in Your Body

Danger !! The beast has required every man woman and child to take his mark! Do NOT take the beast chip or you will burn with the devil and his fallen angels before the Lamb and the holy angels..eternity is a long time..here's your wake up call. In writing.

Seriously.  Can I just die peacefully in my sleep already?  I'm tired of this place.  There is NOTHING else for me to do here really.  Meh.



http://www.therightplanet.com/2012/07/obamacare-page-1004-you-must-have-rfid-chip-implanted-in-your-body/

On Sunday March 21, 2010 the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed and signed into law the following Tuesday. Like I said before, there are a legion of horrible and just plain evil aspects to this bill and I’m sure you’ve heard a lot them by now. I don’t want to discount them but what cannot be missed here is this new law now opens a prophetic door on a magnitude not seen since the reformation of Israel.

This new law requires an RFID chip implanted in all of us. This chip will not only contain your personal information with tracking capability but it will also be linked to your bank account. And get this, Page 1004 of the new law (dictating the timing of this chip), reads, and I quote: “Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment”.It is now the law of the land that by March 23rd 2013 we will all be required to have an RFID chip underneath our skin and this chip will be link to our bank accounts as well as have our personal records and tracking capability built into it.

In just a minute I’m going to show you the black and white of the law itself and you can see it with your own eyes and wonder why an event of this magnitude which is nothing less than seismic in nature is met with little more than silence in the Christian community.

Is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in prophecy? I’ll ask that question again in a minute and follow up on it, but now I want to show you the law itself. I’ve downloaded a PDF copy of HR3200 from the government’s website so what I’m about to show you is from the bill itself its nothing that I’ve written. You can access it all and see it all for yourself straight from the source itself.

H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1.

The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”

What exactly is a class II device that is implantable? As you saw earlier, it is the device approved by the FDA in 2004.

ANTI-GMO CONSUMERS WON'T FORGIVE CHEERIOS

ANTI-GMO CONSUMERS WON'T FORGIVE CHEERIOS - Truth Emerges

It's been over a week since Cheerios had to remove a Pinterest App that actually exposed them for containing Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), being pro-GMO and for *General Mills' funding over $1 million to "No on Proposition 37." Consumers are still slamming Cheerios' Facebook page in their "Recent Posts by Others" section. Actually, thousands of angry comments are now visible on the "face" of their page as well their other sections for comments.

But that's not all - when Cheerios posted a retro commercial called "Grandma's Visit" it was immediately slammed and removed from their Facebook videos. Consumers followed the vid to YouTube and commented on Cheerios' YouTube page. More than 1200 users left negative comments on the Facebook vid before its removal saying things like “Nostalgic old commercials are no substitute for healthy ingredients. I won't buy Cheerios until they are GMO-free.”

We know that they got the message - they haven't posted on their Facebook page in over a week. Cheerios finally responded by patronizing consumers and carving out a special comment section for "robust conversation". So, they aren't backing down from their stance supporting GMO ingredients and their promotion.

The heart of the matter surrounds consumer rage over big food companies' deceptive health marketing, meanwhile, actively funding efforts to stop the labeling of GM foods - the paying consumers' desire for greater transparency. It's like someone smiling while flipping you the bird behind the back - or taking your money and watching you poison yourself. Profits over principles - and consumers won't forgive this time.

Alisa Gravitz, CEO and president of Green America said:

The sheer volume of comments on Cheerios' Facebook page raising concerns around genetically engineered ingredients is incredibly inspiring. GMO Inisde is credited with first stoking the comment-bomb. They also posted this vid by cerealfacts.org showing just how much genetically modified sugar is added when choosing Honey Nut Cheerios:

But some commenters still ask whether Cheerios themselves contained GMOs - mega YES. Regular Cheerios contain modified corn starch and sugar - most likely made from GM sugar beets. Other flavors contain corn syrup, corn, corn bran and canola oil - over 90% chance of GMO contamination there. Guess what else they contain among other harmful substances? Trisodium phosphate - a common and strong cleaning agent. Also a stain remover, degreaser and food additive considered by the FDA as GRAS (generally recognized as safe).

Read more: http://www.activistpost.com/2012/12/anti-gmo-consumers-wont-forgive.html  



Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Nothing Says It As Well As The Heart

The real intent is not in the words spoken, but rather in the unspoken words of the heart. ~me

How Terahertz Waves Used in Airport Scanners Tear Apart DNA



How Terahertz Waves Used in Airport Scanners Tear Apart DNA

A model of the way the THz waves interact with DNA explains how the damage is done and why evidence has been so hard to gather.

Great things are expected of terahertz waves, the radiation that fills the slot in the electromagnetic spectrum between microwaves and the infrared. Terahertz waves pass through non-conducting materials such as clothes , paper, wood and brick and so cameras sensitive to them can peer inside envelopes, into living rooms and “frisk” people at distance.

The way terahertz waves are absorbed and emitted can also be used to determine the chemical composition of a material. And even though they don’t travel far inside the body, there is great hope that the waves can be used to spot tumours near the surface of the skin.

With all that potential, it’s no wonder that research on terahertz waves has exploded in the last ten years or so.

But what of the health effects of terahertz waves? At first glance, it’s easy to dismiss any notion that they can be damaging. Terahertz photons are not energetic enough to break chemical bonds or ionise atoms or molecules, the chief reasons why higher energy photons such as x-rays and UV rays are so bad for us. But could there be another mechanism at work?

The evidence that terahertz radiation damages biological systems is mixed. “Some studies reported significant genetic damage while others, although similar, showed none,” say Boian Alexandrov at the Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and a few buddies. Now these guys think they know why.

Alexandrov and co have created a model to investigate how THz fields interact with double-stranded DNA and what they’ve found is remarkable. They say that although the forces generated are tiny, resonant effects allow THz waves to unzip double-stranded DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication. That’s a jaw dropping conclusion.

And it also explains why the evidence has been so hard to garner. Ordinary resonant effects are not powerful enough to do do this kind of damage but nonlinear resonances can. These nonlinear instabilities are much less likely to form which explains why the character of THz genotoxic effects are probabilistic rather than deterministic, say the team.

This should set the cat among the pigeons. Of course, terahertz waves are a natural part of environment, just like visible and infrared light. But a new generation of cameras are set to appear that not only record terahertz waves but also bombard us with them. And if our exposure is set to increase, the question that urgently needs answering is what level of terahertz exposure is safe.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294: DNA Breathing Dynamics in the Presence of a Terahertz Field

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/416066/how-terahertz-waves-tear-apart-dna/

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Foods That Fight Inflammation

In addition to alot of these foods, I also use serrapeptase and Protandim which has tumeric in it.

Serrapeptase

Serrapeptase, Fibrosis

http://abcnewsvideo.com/keytohealth


http://Mostpowerfulantioxidant.blogspot.com






4,250% Increase in Fetal Deaths Reported to VAERS After Flu Shot Given to Pregnant Women


http://vactruth.com/2012/11/23/flu-shot-spikes-fetal-death/




Someone please tell me where to buy these signs!


Photographers are now Classified as Terrorists

Yeah, it's because you freaks don't like being caught with your pants down, eh?




Homeland Security and FBI Release Document Once Again Labeling Photographers as Potential Terrorists


By Carlos Miller

Photographers are still being classified as potential terrorists in a newly released document from the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI.

The “Roll Call Release,” dated November 13, 2012 and titled “Suspicious Activity Reporting: Photography,” gives a vague reference to a single example where a terrorist may have used cameras to plan attacks.

“In late 2000 and early 2001, convicted al-Qaida operative Dhiren Barot took extensive video footage and numerous photographs of sites in downtown New York City and Washington DC in preparation for planned attacks.”

But then it goes on to list three other examples where people were detained for using cameras in airports, parking garages and shopping malls – which the report describes as “consistent with pre-operational activity and attack planning” – that turned out to have nothing to do with terrorist activity.

But the feds still refer to these detainments as a sign of success because they served for “awareness and training purposes” – as if they need any more training to harass innocent photographers.

And although Barot was convicted of planning attacks, authorities could not connect a video he recorded of the World Trade Center to the actual 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Barot undertook reconnaissance missions in the UK and US in 2000 and 2001, during which he filmed buildings including the International Monetary Fund and World Bank headquarters in Washington DC and the Stock Exchange and Citigroup buildings in New York.

Although there was no evidence that he had foreknowledge of the September 11 attacks on the US, one clip, played in court, showed the World Trade Centre with someone imitating the noise of an explosion in the background.

Barot was also known to visit public libraries to plan possible attacks, so perhaps visiting your local library will soon be regarded as suspicious.

Labeling photographers as potential terrorists has been rampant since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but in 2010, after forcing a man to the ground for video recording a federal courthouse in New York City, the Department of Homeland Security agreed to a settlement, acknowledging that photographing federal buildings is not a crime.

But that still didn’t stop the feds for spreading the message that photographers should be deemed suspicious, including funding municipalities to produce propaganda videos.

Two months ago, it began encouraging citizens to photograph other citizens who take suspicious photographs in order to report them to Homeland Security.

In October, the FBI visited a Houston man at home after he had been seen taking photos near a refinery. He had only been taking pictures of a brewing storm for the National Weather Service.

In 2008, security expert Bruce Schneier wrote his famous “War on Photography” article, in which he stated the following:

Since 9/11, there has been an increasing war on photography. Photographers have been harassed, questioned, detained, arrested or worse, and declared to be unwelcome. We’ve been repeatedly told to watch out for photographers, especially suspicious ones. Clearly any terrorist is going to first photograph his target, so vigilance is required.

Except that it’s nonsense. The 9/11 terrorists didn’t photograph anything. Nor did the London transport bombers, the Madrid subway bombers, or the liquid bombers arrested in 2006. Timothy McVeigh didn’t photograph the Oklahoma City Federal Building. The Unabomber didn’t photograph anything; neither did shoe-bomber Richard Reid. Photographs aren’t being found amongst the papers of Palestinian suicide bombers. The IRA wasn’t known for its photography. Even those manufactured terrorist plots that the US government likes to talk about — the Ft. Dix terrorists, the JFK airport bombers, the Miami 7, the Lackawanna 6 — no photography.

Thanks to Massachusetts Private Eye for the heads up on this story, who found it on an interesting site called Public Intelligence that collects these types of documents, including one from February 2011 where a man was detained in Seattle for “suspicious iPhone photography.”

http://www.photographyisnotacrime.com/2012/12/06/homeland-security-and-fbi-release-document-once-again-labeling-photographers-as-potential-terrorists/


A Sheep No More

Saturday, December 8, 2012

Court Rules FedGov can vaccinate w/out consent

Another STRONG reason to homeschool your children!  Get your children out of the Public Food System now!


Source:  http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/new-york-appeals-court-federal-government-can-vaccinate-your-children-without-your-consent-trumps-state-laws/27478/

New York Appeals Court: Federal Government Can Vaccinate Your Children Without Your Consent – Trumps State Laws

Posted on December 6, 2012 by Admin




Health Impact News Daily – by Brian Shilhavy


The Courthouse News Service is reporting about a case where a public health nurse inoculated kindergartner Madison Parker without her mother’s consent, and against her mother’s wish. The vaccination was Peramivir, in response to the H1N1 flu virus. The mother, Jennifer Parker, sued both the school district and the health department in St. Lawrence County Supreme Court in New York.

The state Supreme Court ruled against the health department, stating that the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) “did not extend to a situation in which a governmental entity administered a drug without consent.” The health department appealed the decision and the Appellate Division concluded on Nov. 21 that PREP pre-empts state law claims, and overturned the decision.

According to Courthouse News, the decision stated that during a declared public health emergency, “we conclude that Congress intended to preempt all state law tort claims arising from the administration of covered countermeasures by a qualified person pursuant to a declaration by the Secretary [of Health and Human Services].”

Wow. So this court is basing, at least some of its judgment, on what they view as what “Congress intended….”

I don’t know if this decision will be appealed or not. But as it stands, this decision states that the Federal Government can trump any State Law during what it considers a “public health emergency” and then inoculate or give pharmaceuticals to children as young as kindergarten age, with no consent from the parents, all in the name of “public health safety.”

What is not even apparently addressed in this case, are the following key points (besides the obvious civil rights issue):

1. Was the H1N1 flu virus any more dangerous than previous seasons’ flu strains? (See: H1N1 Swine Flu Even Milder than Seasonal Strains)

2. Did the H1N1 vaccine conclusively offer protection from the H1N1 flu virus? ( See: New Study Exposes the “60% Effective” Flu Shot as 98.5% Useless)

3. Does the flu vaccine present risks, especially for young children? (See: Confirmed! Flu Vaccine INCREASES Risk of Serious Pandemic Flu Illness; & 4,250% Increase in Fetal Deaths Reported to VAERS After Flu Shot Given to Pregnant Women)


Mom Loses Suit Over Daughter’s H1N1 Vaccine


By MARLENE KENNEDY
Courthouse News Service


ALBANY, N.Y. (CN) – A mother who says public health officials in St. Lawrence County immunized her young daughter without her consent cannot sue, a New York appeals court ruled.

Upon declaration of a public health emergency, the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act pre-empts state tort claims, according to the six-page ruling from the Third Judicial Department of Appellate Division.

“We must presume that Congress fully understood that errors in administering a vaccination program may have physical as well as emotional consequences, and determined that such potential tort liability must give way to the need to promptly and efficiently respond to a pandemic or other public health emergency,” Justice Karen Peters wrote for a five-judge panel.

The St. Lawrence County Public Health Department had arranged a clinic at Lisbon Central School in December 2009 amid a new flu outbreak never previously identified in animals or people.

The K-12 school is in the rural northern New York town of Lisbon, not far from Ogdensburg and the Canadian border.

Federal and state officials declared a public health emergency in response to the H1N1 influenza virus outbreak and recommended administration of the vaccine Peramivir.

A public health nurse inoculated kindergartner Madison Parker even though her mother, Jennifer Parker, had not signed a parental consent form.

Jennifer Parker then sued the school district and the health department in St. Lawrence County Supreme Court, alleging that immunization without consent amounted to negligence and battery on her daughter.

The school district subsequently was dismissed as a defendant because a cause of action was not stated. But the court declined to dismiss the claim against the health department, which had cited the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, known as PREP, and argued that federal pre-emption created a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

It appealed when the court found the PREP protections did not extend to a situation in which a governmental entity administered a drug without consent.

The Appellate Division concluded on Nov. 21 that PREP pre-empts state law claims. PREP contains an express pre-emption clause stating that, during a declared public health emergency, “no state … may establish, enforce or continue in effect with respect to a covered countermeasure any provision of law or legal requirement that (A) is different from, or is in conflict with, any requirement applicable under this section; and (B) related to the … use, … dispensing or administration by qualified persons of the covered countermeasure,” Peters wrote.

A “qualified person” includes licensed health professionals, and liability protections in pandemics “are specifically provided for” in PREP, she added.

“Considering the breadth of the preemption clause together with the sweeping language of the statute’s immunity provision, we conclude that Congress intended to preempt all state law tort claims arising from the administration of covered countermeasures by a qualified person pursuant to a declaration by the Secretary [of Health and Human Services],” the decision states.

The justices said they were “unpersuaded” by Parker’s claim that immunity under PREP did not extend to anyone administering a drug without consent.

“The immunity provisions of the PREP Act are triggered where, as here, the vaccines are purchased pursuant to a federal contract or agreement,” Peters wrote.

PREP also created the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, which handles claims by individuals who suffer adverse reactions to devices, medications or therapies that have been recommended for use in public health emergencies, the decision notes.

Peters further noted that separate federal causes of action exist for wrongful death or serious physical injury resulting from misconduct by licensed health professionals.

“The provision of these exclusive federal remedies further supports our finding of preemption,” she wrote.

Since a federal cause of action is “the exclusive remedy” under PREP, “the complaint must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction,” the decision states.

The St. Lawrence County attorney, Michael Crowe, argued for the health department. Mathew Duprey, of Lekki, Hill, Duprey & Bhatt in Canton, represented Parker.

Anisha Dasgupta of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District and Allyson Levine of the New York Attorney General’s Office filed amicus briefs supporting the health department.

Source: http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/12/03/52769.htm

http://healthimpactnews.com/2012/new-york-appeals-court-federal-government-can-vaccinate-your-children-without-your-consent-trumps-state-laws/



Agenda 21 For Dummies

From A Sheep No More

Agenda 21 for Dummies video link here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzEEgtOFFlM




Explained very well. Including implications it will have on humanity. Opinions within the video come in some cases from those that were in on the negotiations. Truly an interesting watch.

...




 
Agenda 21 for Dummies video link here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzEEgtOFFlM

Here is a full version for those wanting to get more in depth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GykzQWlXJs&feature=share&list=FL9p97LzfoYNlSIkLvir085g

Nostalgic Cheerios commercial receives wild, anti GMO backlash

Nostalgic Cheerios commercial receives wild, anti GMO backlash


Published December 8, 2012   Grant J. Kidney — When Cheerios posted a nostalgic, holiday themed television commercial to its YouTube channel, little did General Mills, the mega corporation that produces the popular cereal brand, expect in terms of the level of protest the video would receive.


When the 31 second YouTube clip entitled, ‘Cheerios: Grandma’s Visit’ was posted to the official Cheerios Facebook page, hundreds of anti GMO protesters commented, expressing a deep concern over the poisoning of most commercial, mainstream food products like Cheerios.

The pic posted is a snapshot of just a few of the comments the post received.


The pic posted is a snapshot of just a few of the comments the post received.

The clip, as it appears on YouTube, also received similar comments from passionate consumers worried about genetically modified foods

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ca6b3C2tKzY






General Mills, along with hundreds of other big named food companies, inject their products with extremely hazardous substances that have been shown to increase one’s risk for cancer.


In some parts of the world, GMOs are banned from public consumption.

Earlier this year, a French study conducted on lab rats showed how giant tumors and early death are inevitable for all who consume GMO foods. The study was later dismissed however by Monsanto, who is, naturally, the largest producer of genetically modified foods in the world.

Of course not everyone is concerned with the consumption of deadly toxins and poisons. On a Yahoo! News article, one person expressed how despite the evidence, they will continue to feed GMO foods to their family.

http://grantjkidney.com/nostalgic-cheerios-commercial-receives-wild-anti-gmo-backlash/




Tough day? Have some displaced anger to vent? Well let it out here on Cheerios FB page and let them know what you think about them and GMOs... 
https://www.facebook.com/Cheerios?ref=ts&fref=ts

Friday, December 7, 2012

Vaccination Rights

Patricia Finn – “I will not, under any circumstances, give up those names… I’ll go to jail first.”




Vaccination rights attorney Patricia Finn threatened with criminal charges; New York State demands she surrender names of all clients

(NaturalNews) Vaccine rights attorney Patricia Finn is being targeted by the Ninth Judicial District of New York State, which has threatened to strip her of her license to practice law and even file criminal charges against her. Finn is one of several "vaccine rights" attorneys across America who helps parents assert their rights to protect their children from potentially deadly vaccines. She's considered a hero by many, but a villain by the status quo for daring to stand up against the vaccine-pimping medical police state that exists in America today.

I personally interviewed Patricia Finn for InfoWars Nightly News last night (February 27, 2012), and during that interview I saw and read the documents that contain the charges being leveled against her. Watch that full video interview at:

http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=C502580E9AE582072C0E9EBD916E2477

One document described her vaccine rights advocacy as "threatening the public interest," asserting that her helping parents legally and ethically avoid toxic vaccines somehow puts the public at risk. This accusation makes absolutely no logical sense, of course, given that even the vaccine pushers claim their vaccines offer absolute and total immunity against infectious disease. Therefore, how can an unvaccinated child ever threaten the health of a vaccinated child?

New York demands Patricia Finn surrender her list of clients

Perhaps even more alarmingly, a letter outlining the various charges against Patricia Finn included the demand that she immediately surrender her complete list of clients to the judiciary. When I saw this, it immediately set off alarm bells. This is not merely a gross violation of attorney/client privilege; it's also a thinly-veiled attempt for the New York judiciary to terrorize the parents who have sought legal help in opting out of dangerous vaccines.

Furthermore, it could serve as the starting point for New York State to dispatch CPS workers to the homes of all of Finn's clients, where their children might be kidnapped by CPS and sold into sex slavery (this is a common behavior of CPS workers across the country, where low-income children simply "disappear" into the system and suffer ongoing sexual abuse by state workers or even high-paying clients, similar to what happened at Penn State). I don't have the space to go into all the evidence that CPS functions as a child kidnapping and sex slavery ring, but the organization isn't called "Communist Pedophile Services" for no reason.

Patricia Finn told me during the InfoWars Nightly News interview that she would absolutely refuse to turn over the list of her clients, and that the judiciary even asking for such a list was a violation of state law. She said she would rather lose her law license than betray the trust of her clients.

Watch Patti Finn speak at the recent WV rally in this YouTube video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBTLe4BT7i4



Follow more updates from Patricia Finn at:

www.facebook.com/PatriciaFinnAttorney

www.PatriciaFinnAttorney.com



The Wakefield Effect

In an InfoWars.com article written by Curt Linderman, Patricia describes the events that led to her being targeted for "legal termination" by New York:

This morning I was served with papers to suspend my license to practice law. The charges are bogus and come on the heels of my address to the Parental Rights Rally in WV. I am also being ordered to disclose the names of people I represent who do not vaccinate… I refuse. I would go to jail first before I give out the names. Please contact all pro vaccine choice organizations and the media… know the truth! I call this harassment the Wakefield Effect! (http://www.infowars.com/ny-ninth-judicial-committee-attacks-vaccine-parental-rights-attorney/...)

The "Wakefield effect," of course, refers to the outrageous and illegal censorship and oppression dished out to anyone who takes a firm stand against the vaccine industry's lies. Merely questioning the mythology of vaccines makes you an instant target for endless ridicule and humiliation followed by a well-planned media smear campaign. Dr. Wakefield, who was viciously slandered by the British Medical Journal, has already filed a lawsuit against the BMJ to clear his name (http://www.naturalnews.com/034629_Andrew_Wakefield_BMJ_Brian_Deer.htm...).


Robert Scott Bell interviewed Patricia Finn on NaturalNews Radio

NaturalNews Radio host Robert Scott Bell also interviewed Patricia Finn yesterday in what turned out to be a stunning audio report. You can download and listen to the entire audio interview at the RSB archives on NaturalNews Radio:

http://naturalnewsradio.com/Archive-RobertScottBell.asp

Highly relevant: Vaccines Armed and Dangerous

Robert Scott Bell and Jon Rappoport, by the way, have just published an astonishing audio course that completely dismantles the lies and mythconceptions of the vaccine industry. This audio course, which I have been listening to myself, teaches you a wealth of information you need to know in order to protect yourself from vaccine zealots and zombies who mindlessly try to push toxic chemical injections on you and your children.

Learn more:
http://www.naturalnews.com/035094_Patricia_Finn_vaccinations_health_freedom.html

If you have difficulties exempting your child from dangerous vaccines, you could look to someone like attorney Patricia Finn for help. But, not if it was up to the State of New York – they’re attempting to revoke her license and her client list. Why?

It’s difficult to say, but we have an idea.

Do you remember the H1N1 flu scam? As covered in the interview below, she helped protect nurses from mandatory vaccination. Consequently, experimental vaccines worth millions of dollars went unused. Think Big Pharma can keep their doors open when parents start rejecting vaccines wholesale?

It isn’t difficult to see why Ms. Finn is such a threat to their bottom line. The problem is, I don’t think they anticipated Patricia’s courage.

In life, you will find very few people willing to stand on principle as Patricia Finn does. In my opinion, she defines the word courage. During our interview she said, “I will not, under any circumstances, give up those names… I’ll go to jail first.”

We need more people like her!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqZRb58Wgi0



http://vactruth.com/2012/03/03/interview-patricia-finn/

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Gun Control




They want the guns!

This is not some fear propaganda being spread by the NRA. The NRA is part of the system anyway. No, this is out in the open. The entire NWO push against guns in America has followed what then Assistant Attorny Eric Holder said in the nineties. In this speech he claimed they would use the media to "brainwash" the public to associate guns with violence and murder. He claimed that part of everyday should be devoted to this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYyqBxD-3xw

Now fast forward to 2012. Prior to the 2012 presidential election something called The UN Small Arms Treaty was underway, in which the US did enter into negotiations.

Which par the UN's charter forces those nations to abide by the final draft of the treaty. ( http://wramsite.com/xn/detail/3567481:Topic:1386216?xg_source=activity ) http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE8A627J20121107?irpc=932  Now during the presidential debates Obama played to the emotions of people by using the false flag shooting in Aurora, the same one that occurred during the first round of talks of the UN small small arms treaty. He likens the second amendment to "hunting and sportsmen". He openly calls for the ban of all semi autos here. He talks about Chicago having a problem with handgun related murders. He played to the crowds ignorance at the fact Chicago, and the Aurora theater are gun free zones. Meaning law abiding citizens can not attain firearms, ( http://www.californiaconcealedcarry.com/news/nugent.html )something the nwo wants the entire country to look like.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t909161/

The latest propaganda against the second amendment coming out of the NFL with Bob Costas blaming the gun culture for the murder suicide of an NFL player. It wasn't the psychotropic drugs, it wasn't the individual, no it was the inanimate handgun that picked itself up and shot the man's girlfriend and himself. Remember Eric Holder "brainwash the public". If they come for the guns it is an undeniably FACT that would cause a civil war. The NWO wants this because under article 15 of the UN small arms treaty the UN troops will assist with disarming the public. They already did so in Venezuela. http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/south-america/item/11632-with-un-support-socialist-chavez-disarms-civilians-in-venezuela

" Article 15 International Assistance

In fulfilling the obligation of this Treaty, States Parties may seek, inter alia, legal assistance, legislative assistance, technical assistance, institutional capacity building, material assistance or financial assistance. States, in a position to do so, shall provide such assistance. States Parties may contribute resources to a voluntary trust fund to assist requesting States Parties requiring such assistance to implement the Treaty.

States Parties shall afford one another the widest measure of assistance, consistent with their respective legal and administrative systems, in investigations, prosecutions and judicial proceedings in relation to the violations of the national measures implemented to comply with obligations under of the provisions of this Treaty.

Each State Party may offer or receive assistance, inter alia, through the United Nations international, regional, subregional or national organizations, non-governmental organizations or on a bi-lateral basis. Such assistance may include technical, financial, material and OTHER forms of assistance as needed, upon request."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyVldVMA7vU

Lest we forget, they already confiscated guns here in America during Hurricane Katrina. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tta1qhQZWSE

~ Morgan B






"How Old Do You Have To Be To Buy A Gun: Buying and Transferring Laws"
https://gunforest.com/blog/how-old-do-you-have-buy-a-handgun/



The Truth About Your Birth Certificate

A birth certificate is a paper establishing an ownership claim over your body, by the government. You are a slave and they have the paperwork to prove it.





VIDEO:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfnJ1rOFK7o



READ MORE:

http://www.mainemediaresources.com/mpl_birthcert.htm     http://www.thewomenwarriors.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=483

Toxic effects of Fluoride



Why all of the hubbub over fluoride? After all, it's a chemical that supposedly serves to improve our lives and our health, right? The fact is research has shown repeatedly that long-term fluoride consumption can be extremely harmful, even deadly.

http://www.naturalnews.com/038217_fluoride_tap_water_side_effects.html

US Government Blocks Info that Vaccines Cause Autism




US Government Blocks Info that Vaccines Cause Autism

Here’s proof that the US government is blocking information that vaccines cause autism—and your opportunity to do something about it. Will you speak out now? Or will you let this developing trajedy hit more of our children as the vaccine schedule increases?
by The Rev, The Thinking Mom’s Revolution


Four days have passed since the congressional hearings on autism.

What was called a national emergency, an epidemic, in the hallowed halls of Congress on November 29th, 2012, has received nary a sound byte from the mainstream media.

In that time, hundreds more children have been injected with live and dead viruses. Hundreds more babies have had their tiny, undeveloped immune systems assaulted with heavy metals and toxic adjuvants. For them, the inflammatory cascade has just begun. And like us, it will take their parents years to figure it out. Many of these children will die. Their deaths will be called SIDS. Some of them will get a high fever, diarrhea, a rash, and they will lose their ability to crawl or walk. For them, it will be called autism. Others will be put on the path of chronic inflammatory illness. Their joints, lungs, bowels and brains labeled defective, their parents encouraged by their doctor, “With medication they will still live happy productive lives. We see a lot of this these days.”

Customers for life.




Please settle in. I am about to share with you the evidence that demonstrates the medical and scientific genesis of autism by vaccination. Then, I am going to show you how this information has been suppressed by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ). In this research, compiled by attorney Rolf Hazlehurst, you are about to see the irrefutable proof of what our community has surmised and asserted for decades. These documents are not theory or conjecture. They are fact. These are your talking points for your local press outlets. These are the documents you need to take with you the next time you visit your pediatrician. These are the attachments you will email your congressmen to demand a second congressional hearing on the Zimmerman Report.

The Back Story

So many suits had been filed in Vaccine Court claiming autism, the court could not effectively address each one. So, instead of reviewing the individual medical records of each child, they herded them all into the Omnibus Autism Proceedings. Various theories were developed asserting the cause of autism. Most of those theories centered specifically around thimerosal and MMR.

Sidenote: In real courts, precedent is a determining factor in theoretical causation. Precedent is not permitted in vaccine court. Meaning that any case that’s won is sealed and attorneys are not allowed to review the medical documentation that influenced the award in that case.

Vaccine court is not a court, but rather an administrative proceeding that takes place at the DOJ, which is an extension of DHHS.—the same agency tasked with promoting and marketing vaccines to the public.

Of the thousands of petitioners awaiting litigation (more appropriately, processing), a handful of families were chosen to represent all.

Yeah, I know. What does this have to do with Dr. Zimmerman?

Dr. Zimmerman is one of the most respected pediatric neurologists in the country. In the first test case, Cedillo vs. HHS, which was processed in June 2007, he was not called to testify, as he had been so many times before. Instead, his written expert opinion was submitted into evidence. As Rolf points out in the memo attached, “This would not be permissible in a court of law.” At the time, Dr. Zimmerman’s written opinion did not support the causal relationship between vaccines and autism. The Cedillos were denied awards for their daughter’s vaccine injury.

Two months after the Cedillo case was effectively processed out of court, Poling vs. HHS was identified as another test case. But, it was quietly conceded. Without expert testimony! You can hear the Polings’ take on this turn of events here:

http://www.oprah.com/oprahradio/Buddhism-Rx_1?topic=spirit

Another two months passed and Hazelhurst vs. HHS was processed. Like the Cedillos, the family of Yates Hazelhurst was denied awards based on the written expert testimony of Dr. Zimmerman.

However, between Cedillo and Hazlehurst, Dr, Zimmerman submitted his revised testimony upon investigation of Hannah Poling’s condition. See Exhibit 3.

The developing brain is especially vulnerable to mitochondrial dysfunction because of its high metabolic energy demands, and may be critically injured by marginal energy supplied by mitochondria under conditions of stress, such as infections and immune stimulation. Such cellular metabolic injuries in the brain during early childhood typically evolve over time as the child develops and may express themselves as the child grows. An analogy to this situation is birth injury followed by cerebral palsy (CP). Patients with CP may develop epilepsy months or years after the brain insult, but the original insult is still the cause of the epilepsy. This child may improve and make progress developmentally, but then later develop epilepsy or other neurological impairments (e.g. learning disorders). Thus, the time delay between vaccination, encephalopathy, and seizure onset does not preclude a causal relationship.

Again for emphasis:

“Thus, the time delay between vaccination, encephalopathy, and seizure onset does not preclude a causal relationship.”

Please read this two-page document in its entirety. It’s all there.

“Correlation does not equal causation,” the mantra of the mainstream and celebrity doctor communities for the past 10 years, becomes nothing more than an advertisement for cigarette safety with this one document alone.

I get it, but what does this have to do with me?

Do you have a small child with autism? Had this evidence been permitted to see the light of day, instead of sealed and the contents hidden from the American public, odds are good your child would not have been injected with autism. If doctors and pediatricians around the country had been made privy to these incredibly important findings, the “autism epidemic” Congress repeatedly referred to last Thursday would have been stopped in its tracks.

But instead, it was covered up.

DOJ attorney Lynn Ricciardella articulated during oral arguments in the Hazelhurst case, “We’re not even at the stage where it’s medically or scientifically possible.” However, she personally, months before this, sealed the Zimmerman letter that attests to the fact that it is not just possible, it’s probable that vaccines cause autism.

“I hold these opinions to a reasonable degree of medical certainty.” Dr. Zimmerman concluded.

Dr. Zimmerman is a respected physician whose expert opinion the vaccine court has routinely relied upon. Until now.

In summation, the DHHS knowingly concealed Dr. Zimmerman’s revised report from the American public, and used his old testimony to deny awards to the family of Yates Hazlehurst. This one act of concealment resulted in the dismissal of 5,000 plus Omnibus cases and the suppression of medical science that could save the lives of countless children. They are knowingly harming children on a consistent and continual basis.

Why? Because they can, friends. They can.


http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2012-12-04/us-doj/    


So how many people have died or lives ruined as a result of keeping this information hidden? This is grounds for massive class action lawsuits against global big pharmaceutical companies for their actions over the last 70 years! But it wont happen because they own the govt., so this will all be buried again … ARE YOU ANGRY YET?