Friday, February 13, 2015

Vaccinations: Truth or Dare

Vaccinations: Truth or Dare

By Cameron Salisbury (about the author)

February 13, 2015 at 13:16:39

Syringe and vaccine
(image by PATH global health)




In 2003, the US entered its war with Iraq and everyone headed for the Middle East, including soldiers, support personnel and onlookers, was required to get a smallpox vaccination.

David Bloom, an NBC journalist embedded with the troops, died suddenly soon after arriving in Iraq from a blood clot called Deep-Vein Thrombosis (DVT). The news media speculated that his death may have been caused by the long plane ride to Iraq.

But in the halls of the nation's premier public-health agency they were whispering something else: Bloom's death was probably caused by the smallpox vaccine, which is well known to have cardiovascular side effects.

Since smallpox had been eradicated from the planet in the 1970s, the only smallpox risk in 2003 came from the vaccine itself. The government's possible  complicity in the death of David Bloom and uncounted others was never made public.

Soon after the Gulf War started in 1991 we were introduced to Gulf-War Syndrome, a debilitating condition with many and varied devastating autoimmune symptoms. Even today it compromises the life and health of over one-third of the 700,000 combat veterans who served in the Middle East. The government's best shot at an explanation ranged all over the place, from sarin gas, to depleted uranium, to smoke from burning oil wells, to 'it's all in their heads'. Outside researchers, however, reached another conclusion that provides something that eluded the military: an explanation that makes sense. They found compelling evidence that the symptoms of an induced autoimmune disorder are consistent with the administration of an experimental anthrax vaccine that was secretly administered to half the troops, without informed consent, as an illegal research study on a captive audience. The problematic ingredient in the vaccine was an additive called squalene, which has been shown to be a disaster for the immune system. It is still used in some vaccines today.

In Syria last year, 15 children died after receiving a contaminated measles vaccine sponsored by the U.N. Unlike the vaccine, there were no deaths reported from the disease. In what appeared to be an effort to reassure the public, there was an intense campaign designed to convince us that the poison vaccine was contaminated due to human error. It was all just a tragic accident. Big Pharma wasn't at fault. Honest.

Do you get the heavily promoted annual flu vaccine? Well, CDC admits that the formula for the vaccine this year is a near-total miss. It won't work for the strain now going around, although they claim, incongruously, that it is partially effective for a few. They have yet to admit how often the flu vaccine is produced based on a wrong guess, which in my experience in public health is pretty often. Production of the flu vaccine requires a 2-year lead time in advance of the expected outbreak, far too early to know which strain of the ever-mutating virus will show up. A flu shot exposes us to all of the potential side effects that go along with vaccines, including those spelled out in the 1986 Vaccine Act, such as brain damage, paralytic disorders, anaphylaxis, seizures and death, and very likely none of the benefits we expected. The government knows this. They didn't tell you?

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is currently spending a fortune vaccinating children in developing countries. Unfortunately, the secondary effects of the polio vaccine is being blamed for 47,500 cases in India alone of a polio-mimicking paralytic disease. While Bill Gates is congratulating himself on the near eradication of polio, India is overwhelmed by the human side effects of his largesse. The problem is well documented in the international press but is carefully censored in the vaccine-hysterical US.

This is not the first episode where a vaccine has, sadly, caused the disease being inoculated against. The Salk Vaccine for polio seemed God-sent in the 1950s, except by families where the vaccine actually gave polio to their children. Virologists estimated in 1955 that the vaccine caused as many cases of polio in the U.S. as it prevented.

Autism and childhood vaccines? There is far too much anecdotal evidence that young children react badly when their immune systems are challenged by 30 to 40 vaccines for the government to glibly dismiss cause and effect. Scientists know that they can't prove that autism is not related to vaccines, but their careful wording is continually misinterpreted to mean that they have done the impossible and proven a negative.

Over and over we hear the groupthink repeated: vaccines do not cause autism. But that is not what researchers say. What scientists actually admit is that they have found no link between autism and vaccines, a statement that exists in an entirely different dimension. That they have not identified cause and effect does not mean that it doesn't exist, as they know well.

In the meantime, the number of autistic and neurologically damaged children in the U.S. continues to skyrocket beyond all reason, in tandem with the increasing number of officially mandated vaccines.

One possible reason for the government's public insistence that vaccines are "safe and effective" is the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), monitored by the CDC, and the Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund (VICP) adjudicated by the Department of Justice. Despite the hurdles, roadblocks and bad faith that make collecting from the fund nearly impossible, the fund has nevertheless compensated 2500 claims with roughly $2 billion since the inception in 1986 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (the Vaccine Act). We can only imagine what the cost to taxpayers would be if CDC admitted their major vaccine problems.

Does it sound like the government really believes that vaccines are "safe and effective"?

In addition to mandating the compensation of vaccine-injured children, The Vaccine Act of 1986 does something else. It removes all liability from Big Pharma for the damages their vaccines cause and places it squarely on the taxpayer. It's a get-out-of-jail-free card and a major contributor to the profitability.of vaccines. It is also a fundamental reason why the pharmaceutical companies are anxious to develop new, untested vaccines and then convince us that we need them.

Does it sound like Big Pharma thinks its products are safe?

Another reason for the government's insistence on unsafe vaccinations is its allegiance to the profits of big business. Vaccines are a big moneymaker for Merck, Pfizer, and others, and Big Pharma is a huge contributor to both political parties and individual politicians.

There are compelling reasons beyond the sordid government-corporate history of vaccines that leads informed parents to say no to vaccinating their children. That will be the discussion in my next post.

******************************

References:






The Guggie Daily: Shepherds are Supposed to Protect, not Sacrifice Lambs...

The Guggie Daily: Shepherds are Supposed to Protect, not Sacrifice Lambs...: When people discuss vaccinations, they are typically referring to the vaccination program for infants and children. This program, including prenatal vaccines, just reached 58 vaccines by age 6 for 2015...

The Guggie Daily
I've been meaning to address something in the vaccine debate that isn't being directly confronted. 
When people discuss vaccinations, they are referring to the process of injecting a minor (infant, child) with a prophylactic medication. When people discuss vaccine compliance, they are referring to forcing parents to vaccinate minors. 
They rarely discuss consenting adults who make a voluntary decision to vaccinate THEMSELVES.
In other words, the debate itself is rigged. It's inherently flawed. If this was really about the noble aspects of protecting the helpless and the innocent, then our program would be backwards. We would be calling for all adults to roll up their sleeves for complete vaccinations, and regular titre testing then re-vaccination if immunity thresholds weren't high enough. The adults would be sacrificing for the children.
Instead, what we want is for the MOST vulnerable to be fully vaccinated. We want the people with the LEAST DEVELOPED IMMUNE SYSTEMS and the MOST TO LOSE, the ones who cannot consent, and who cannot even talk to describe their pain and adverse reactions to forcefully endure prophylactic medical interventions.
Taking a vaccine is a risk to yourself, to others, and to society as a whole. Every vaccine has side effects and risks, short term and long term. You risk injury or death to yourself. You risk spreading the vaccine-disease to others and injuring or killing them. And you risk altering the epidemiology of society as a whole, including through multiple generations.
Let's look at antibiotics as an example (although a restricted one b/c antibiotics are usually given to a treat an existing disease and not injected into healthy people.)
When you take antibiotics, you have a risk to yourself and a risk to others. You can directly injure or kill yourself, and you can alter the bacterial ecosystem, resulting in resistant strains that put the entire world at risk.
So, for example, thanks to people and the agri-industry overusing antibiotics, we now have super-bugs as the media calls them, showing resistance to antibiotics and increasing the risk for complications and death.
Similarly, the decisions you make regarding vaccinations will alter your health and the rest of society.
BUT, that's not the whole story. Because this isn't about adults freely consenting to what products they put into their body that might risk others, such as smoking or driving drunk, or using carcinogenic household products that are washed into our water supply.
This is about demanding that parents force vaccines into their non-consenting children, when no disease is present and lesser treatments (nutrition, supplements, etc) have not been tried first. This violates every aspect of ethical medicine in our human existence.
Not only are proponents of vaccination demanding that parents use vaccines, which carry risks for individuals and society, but they are demanding that we do so over the bodily integrity and human rights of the children, the most innocent and defenseless.
This is a program directed towards minors who cannot consent and it involves a prophylactic medical intervention without any immediate lifesaving indication.
The vaccine debate is not only about diseases and efficacy, studies and money. It's about basic human rights to bodily integrity and informed consent in the medical system.
If you believe in vaccine theory and you want to alter society's epidemiology of disease for better or for worse, then YOU roll up your sleeve and YOU make that choice. Don't pretend your desire to force every infant and child to endure 58 vaccines by age 6 is somehow altruistic.


The Guggie Daily: 9 Signs You're Debating with a Pro-vaccine Narcissist...

The Guggie Daily: 9 Signs You're Debating with a Pro-vaccine Narcissist...: What I usually see when it comes to vaccine discussion are parents with a variety of opinions and decisions, who tend to respect others'...


Ten Little Known Facts About the Vaccination Program

. . . IN THE UNITED STATES 1)   There are scientific peer-reviewed papers that have exposed the dangers of many vaccines as well as the “herd immunity myth”.  [See the International Medical Council on Vaccination.]  And, there is evidence that the Center for Disease Control (CDC) has intentionally kept this information away from public health workers, physicians, legislators and the general public.  [See: Deadly Immunity by Robert Kennedy, Jr, Science for Sale by Dr David Lewis, Red Ice Creations interview with researcher scientist Dr Brian Hooker.]
2)   A 2013 Harvard Study exposed the epidemic of corruption in government institutions by Big Pharma influence and money.  [See: Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs]
3)   Those manufacturing, ordering or administering vaccines have been granted immunity from liability should their drug cause injury, illness or even  death.  [See Supreme Court decision Bruesewitz versus Wyeth]
4)   Vaccine package inserts are intentionally substituted with CDC propaganda denying parents/patients full disclosure. [See American Academy of Pediatrics’ Refusal to Vaccinate document, that no one should sign.]
5)   Vaccine schedules have been established by the CDC and are promoted by public health departments, the American Academy of Pediatrics and other various organizations. CDC recommendations are not science-based as many of their reports have been altered to hide pertinent and damning information.  [See former CDC scientist Dr David Lewis’ book Science for Sale]
6)   The CDC is not a government health advocacy organization. It is a for-profit corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet and headquartered in the STATE OF GEORGIA, with strong ties to the pharmaceutical industry. Therefore, their recommendations are influenced by the ‘fiscal’ health of their corporation.
7)   Physician or institutional records are frequently reviewed by the STATE public health department, which is also a for-profit corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet, who receives monetary compensation from the CDC to perform this function. Therefore, the state public health department’s recommendations and actions are influenced by the ‘fiscal’ health of their own corporation.
8)   The AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS and the AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS are not health advocacy organizations. They are trade associations-corporations (listed on Dun and Bradstreet) that are head-quartered in the STATE OF ILLINOIS and the STATE OF KANSAS respectively, whose monetary compensation from the vaccine manufacturers contributes to the ‘fiscal’ health of their corporations.
9)   Physicians (who are intentionally misinformed by the CDC and Big Pharma and who cannot be sued for vaccine injuries) are paid higher reimbursement rates for each “fully vaccinated” child.
10)   LEGISLATORS for the STATE have passed corporate statutes mandating certain vaccines for attendance in educational institutions. As the LEGISLATORS have no medical training and can easily be influenced by drug company lobbyists and or the CDC, INC, their statutes are not scientifically motivated.   [See retired pharmacist and lobbyist Kristine Severyn’s Profits not Science, Motivate Vaccine Mandates]
Pdf
Best,
AL


--
AL Whitney
Retired Registered Respiratory Therapist
Former Court Appointed Special Advocate for Children
Spouse of a retired Family Practitioner

People for Safe Technologies