Wednesday, January 22, 2014

HIV-NEGATIVE AIDS: Is it CFS, GWS, or AIDS?

Very informative blog on AIDS, HIV, CFS, FMS, Vaccines, Chemtrails, Remedies and more...

HIV-NEGATIVE AIDS: Is it CFS, GWS, or AIDS?

[Vaccination-Liberation] Massive Fetal Deaths - CDC Misleads Nation

Press Release                               
For Immediate Release  
Wednesday, January 22, 2014

National Coalition of Organized Women  
Ncowmail@gmail.com
319 855-0307     
Contact: Eileen Dannemann

1-22-14_PressRelease_Final_CDC_cover_up_.doc

 CDC Misleads Nations Ob/Gyns -Covering-up Of The Most Massive Fetal Death Reports Associated With The Influenza Vaccine in the History of Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)

 Dr. Gary Goldman’s study on the 4,250% spike in fetal death reports during the 2009/10 H1N1 “pandemic” originally rejected by the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology (AJOG), who is charged by the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) as complicit in a massive cover-up and manipulation of data associated with the 2009/10 flu season fetal deaths is now available free to the public. Subsequently published in the Human & Experimental Toxicology Journal (HET), as a Sage choice study, the Goldman study is now listed in Pub med as a free PMC article.

Comparison of VAERS fetal-loss reports during three consecutive influenza seasons: was there a synergistic fetal toxicity associated with the two-vaccine 2009/2010 season? Goldman GS. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2013 May;32(5):464-75.

Despite an apparent trail of documented collusion and misconduct amongst the CDC, AJOG (Elsevier) and 9 non-profits including the March of Dimes, this alarmingly poor outcome of the 2009/10 H1N1vaccine experiment on the fetuses of pregnant women was successfully covered up by the CDC until Goldman exposed the statistics, documenting the harm in his recent publication.

Dr. Marie McCormick, chairperson of the CDC’s H1N1 Vaccine Safety Risk and Assessment Working Group (VSRAWG) testified, and submitted deceptive reports to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), contending no unusual signals nor adverse outcomes in the pregnant population during the 2009/10 public experiments on pregnant women.

However, pressed by the NCOW statistics extracted from the government’s own data, Dr. Shimabukuro of the Centers of Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) corroborated the NCOW data in a public presentation (slide 20) in Atlanta, Georgia, in October of 2010. This contradiction to Dr.McCormick’s testimony evidences that the CDC indeed knew of the increasing level in fetal-loss reports, in near real time.  Yet the CDC failed to immediately notify the nation’s Ob/Gyns, who, uninformed, continued to double-dose their pregnant patients with the fetal-fatal flu shots that collectively delivered up to 50 micrograms of mercury. Due to the success of this well-orchestrated cover up and the complicity of the non profits and AJOG, pregnant women are now pressured to get 4 vaccine doses, (Flu, TDaP) and thereafter are mandated to give up to 49 vaccine doses to their surviving children in order for them to attend school.

Beyond Junk Science:
“If vaccines were actually based on ‘science’, then this public experiment is a failure” says Ms. Dannemann, Director of the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) and founder of the Vaccine Liberation Army. “So why are we still vaccinating pregnant women with even more vaccines when there is no science that proves vaccines are safe for the developing child? On the contrary, available data from this public experiment foisted on unwitting pregnant women proves the opposite - that the influenza vaccines are unsafe and exacerbate fetal deaths.”

In 2009/10 the CDC initiated a massive public drug trial, whose outcome was devastatingly morbid, covered up and, more egregious, twisted by complicit medical journal editors, government agencies and non profit organizations in order to provide an unholy, misleading and deceptive basis for a worldwide publicity campaign, "Flu Shot Is Safe for Pregnant Women”.  The success of this manipulation and collusion continues to result in an ever-increasing amount of vaccine recommendations for pregnant women advancing the flawed, unproven practice of maternal antibody-transfer to the fetus.

Vaccine Providers have immunity from lawsuits for any vaccine injury. Federal law prevents directly suing a vaccine provider and the federal government agency charged with ensuring vaccine safety. However, government personnel can be held accountable for willful misconduct contingent on the approval of the Secretary of HHS.  But, what about the non-profits that signed off on the joint letter for the following flu season urging the nation’s OB/Gyns to continue to vaccinate their pregnant patients? Can they be held accountable?

A joint letter orchestrated by the CDC and co-signed by 9 non-profit organizations was sent in the fall of 2010, specifically targeting the nation’s Ob/Gyns who, upon the recommendation of the CDC, had been injecting their pregnant patients with two separate influenza vaccines, the seasonal and the H1N1 vaccine, each containing 25 mcgs of mercury, totaling 50 mcgs of mercury, regardless of the trimester or the weight of the fetus. The letter, strategically omitting reference to the 2009/10 VAERS data or Thimerosal, recommended only one seasonal flu shot for the following year, which as a trivalent, has all the necessary strains in one vaccine thereby limiting the toxic mercury dose to 25 mcgs instead of the fetus-fatal 50 mcgs.  If 50 mcgs. kills a fetus. Will 25 mcgs still harm the survivors?  Where is the science?

Although continuously informed by independent researchers, credible whistleblowers such as Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., social networks and Internet media, of the agency’s long record of distorted studies, acts of omission, misconduct, deception, spurious and strategic rhetoric, State lawmakers remain mindlessly wed to the CDC’s vast range of flawed government vaccine programs without evaluation… and wonder why the public is “acting up!”

But most egregious, in the opinion of NCOW – the agency assigned to educate physicians and protect the public’s health chose not to notify the nation’s Ob/Gyns in near real time, as promised by Dr. McCormick, thus putting the vaccine program itself ahead of the public’s health in order save this expanding pregnancy vaccine program from the immediate collapse it merits.  More disingenuous, the letter states despite the disturbing VAERS data:

“Influenza vaccine is safe” because:
“Influenza vaccines have been given to millions of pregnant women over the last decade and have not been shown to cause harm to women or their infants”.

“Hold on”, says Ms. Dannemann. “The vaccine manufacturers themselves state and have stated for the past decade that there are no adequate studies on the effect of vaccines on human fetuses or on reproduction.  Manufacturers’ package inserts, Pregnancy Category C states and I quote ‘Animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect on the fetus and there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in humans’.  How did the CDC get away with recommending the vaccination of pregnant women for the last decade without proof of safety?  Law requires proof of safety!  Well here is a safety study, albeit the sad results of another government experiment foisted on an unwitting public”, submits Dannemann. “The Goldman study!”

Can these non-profits be held liable for participating in the collusion to deceive the public?   Did the CDC tell the March of Dimes before they signed off on the joint letter urging the nation's Ob/Gyns to continue vaccinating pregnant women - that the outcome of the 2009/10 government initiative to vaccinate pregnant women with the flu shot resulted in the most massive spike of fetal death reports in the history of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)?

Or did the CDC purposely mislead the March of Dimes & the other non-profits by omitting the morbid data, seducing them into a campaign targeting the nation's physicians and misleading the public and in doing so, save the ill-founded pregnancy vaccine program from falling apart?  Why does the American public not have a mechanism to investigate the misconduct of the CDC thereby allowing the agency to continue to harm the very public they are supposed to protect?

Who has the authority on behalf of the public--on behalf of humanity to get an answer to this very simple question of whether the 9 non-profits were complicit in co- signing the joint letter, misleading the nation’s physicians?  Was the HHS misled when Dr. Mc Cormick omitted the VAERS data from her monthly reports? “Because the public apparently has no champion or channel to investigate this alleged collusion, the vaccine program for pregnant women advances unimpeded and continues to disable the emerging generations of humanity by weakening the fetuses and sabotaging its formative wellness!”, exhorts, Dannemann

The vaccine manufacturers package inserts state that there are no studies on the effect of vaccines on fetuses or on reproduction and yet, despite no safety studies as required by law, the CDC joint letter broadly admits that it has been giving pregnant women the flu vaccine for a decade. On what science does the CDC base its rhetoric that there are no harmful effects when autism, allergies, asthma, juvenile diabetes, obesity and alleged “mental illness” as seen in children at very early ages, is at epidemic proportions concomitant to increased childhood vaccine mandates? How does this history of increased chronic illness in children, concomitant to increase childhood vaccine mandates, justify further weakening the emerging generation with in-utero assault? In light of this clearly failed public experiment with its morbid statistics and no safety studies from the manufacturers why are we continuing to vaccinate pregnant women? , The director of NCOW further opines.

Still another 2012 study involving analysis of maternal transfer of mercury to the developing embryo/fetus, by Brown et al. has been recently published, confirming the Goldman study.  Data demonstrated that Hg [mercury] exposures, particularly during the first trimester of pregnancy, at well-established dose/eight ratios produced severe damage to humans including death." (Brown IA, Austin DW. Maternal transfer of mercury to the developing embryo/fetus: Is there a safe level?)

Sadly, due to the CDC cover up, there is no official follow up of the children that survived this catastrophic epoch in vaccine history. Asthma, diabetes, allergies, autism, ADHD, bi polar symptoms associated with vaccine injury is on the rise. “Given the recent publications of Goldman and Brown studies, is the CDC obliged to alert the nation’s pediatricians and parents of a potential health crisis in children injected in-utero in 2009/10 with 50 mcgs of Thimerosal (mercury), so they can consider cause, and treat accordingly? Or will media, physicians, healthcare professionals, public, HHS officials and lawmakers, in apathetic powerlessness, continue to allow the CDC to shove this under the rug in an effort to hide the injurious nature of the over ambitious and costly pregnancy and childhood vaccine programs?”, comments, Ms. Dannemann.

Access all hot links on http://vaccineliberationarmy.com/2014/01/20/cdc-cover-up-links/


THE POISONED NEEDLE 1957 A PLANNED MEDICAL CONSPIRACY

Jim Novax Okelly
From the book ,” THE POISONED NEEDLE 1957
A PLANNED MEDICAL CONSPIRACY
“This medical strangle hold did not just happen with the passing of time; it was a planned conspiracy against the American people, with an “eye” to the financial gains of the doctors. A sample of this strategy may be seen in the following speech of Dr. W.A. Evans, one of the top medical bosses, and Health Commissioner for the city of Chicago, who gave these instructions to the doctors in their annual convention of the American Medical Association in 1911:
“The thing for the medical profession to do is to get right into, and man every important health movement; man health departments, tuberculosis societies, housing societies, child care and infant societies ,etc. The future of the profession depends on it…THE PROFESSION CANNOT AFFORD TO HAVE THESE PLACES OCCUPIED BY OTHER THAN MEDICAL MEN.”
“This pronouncement was published in the journal of the A.M.A.., September 16, 1911.”
With the help of the drug and insurance companies and ignorant lawmakers, they have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. I have learned the truth about the Laws of Health and the real cause of disease. What good did it do me? I fired my doctor over 50 years ago. I take no drugs.(meds)I have never bought health insurance in my life. And I have no fear of their fear tactics, lies or intimidation.

Vaccination Liberation - Indiana

Jim O'Kelly, director
P.O. Box 78
Wheeler, Indiana 46393
219-462-1976
jimokelly@yahoo.com


The Poisoned Needle by Eleanor McBean (1957) Complete book on-line (Suppressed Facts About Vaccinations):





Hard Copy (Amazon):




THE FACTS AGAINST COMPULSORY VACCINATION-1929

Jim Novax Okelly
THE FACTS AGAINST COMPULSORY VACCINATION-1929

Declaration by Dr. John P. Koehler, Commissioner of Health of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in an article in the Wisconsin Medical Journal, November, 1925.
“Since people cannot be vaccinated against their will, the biggest job of a health department has always been, and always will be, to persuade the unprotected people to get vaccinated. This we attempted to do in three ways: first by education; second by fright; and third, by pressure....
We dislike very much to mention fright and pressure, yet they accomplish more than education, because they work faster than education, which is normally a slow process.”

Have their tactics changed? Do you think these so-called outbreaks are real? Has their been an outbreak in your area? With this type of an attitude, do you think that the health departments of today believe in honesty? Is it not their goal to poison everybody in the world? Do you now understand when you talk to a doctor today and express your doubts, they become outraged? And if their nice, maybe they just don’t want to lose business and figure eventually you will change your mind? Do you really think that these people are looking out for your child’s best interest?

EDUCATE BEFORE YOU MEDICATE
INVESTIGATE BEFORE YOU VACCINATE



Vaccination Liberation - Indiana

Jim O'Kelly, director
P.O. Box 78
Wheeler, Indiana 46393
219-462-1976
jimokelly@yahoo.com




It is now against federal law to criticize vaccination

If you had ever alleged Dr. Paul Offit's work to be scientific fraud, then you 
violated federal law, should this recent court decision hold.

Since dissent against fluoridation, vaccination, and HIV=AIDS began, official 
science has become official government science.

but now, official government science protected by the law. it cannot be 
criticized without penalty.  Under the threat that their official science might 
not be believed, liberal elites who feel they are the repository of all wisdom, 
are outlawing the heresy of scientific dissent.  now the courts are involved to 
punish heresy.

i'm curious: After being ridiculed by liberals as "flat earthers" on climate 
change and embryonic stem cells, how soon, if ever, will conservatives be ripe 
for accepting the dissenting views on vaccination?

BTW, why did a federal court hear this libel suit?!  This is yet more evidence 
of the growing leviathan that is the central government.
see:  http://blog.heritage.org/2014/01/20/happens-break-law-didnt-know/


----Gary Krasner


ARTICLE:

July 26, 2013
Mann vs. Steyn: Heresy Shall Be Crushed
By Daren Jonescu
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/07/mann_vs_steyn_heresy_shall_be_crushed.html

excerpt:

Mann has taken his critics to court -- all of them, in effect, with Steyn and NRO as stand-ins -- for saying his research is fraudulent and bogus. The court has upheld the legitimacy of his suit by citing the support of his research by precisely the organizations with the greatest vested interest in his vindication -- including government agencies deeply involved in climate change advocacy (EPA and NOAA), and a public university. The message: the State is on board with Mr. Mann, and has had enough of his work being challenged.