Saturday, April 2, 2016

Snopes

Um, huh?  Seriously?  The most noticeable form of complete mind control is when people search for truth on snopes, rather than doing independent research. I literally feel sorry for people when they link snopes saying "Look at this! It's on snopes, which means it's not true"

Okay...., what year was Snopes established? Who owns it? Does anyone even consider these questions when viewing their website of misleading and biased information?

Don't do that to yourself. Snopes is ran by a husband and wife, with no college education and had no prior investigative reporting history. I mean, if you do it, ask yourself what makes their truth superior? Then ask yourself how influenced their truth is by third party bribery and incentive bonuses?

Do real research before you just put your trust in a website ran by bought bigots.

Snopes has been caught lying, many times. Snopes has been snoped before.


http://whoisjohngalt.hubpages.com/hub/Snopes-got-Snoped
Infographic courtesy of Infowar Social Networking Coalition

Snopes.com has been considered the 'tell-all final word' on any comment, claim and email. Once negative article by them and people point and say, "See, I told you it wasn't true!" But what is Snopes? What are their methods and training that gives them the authority to decide what is true and what is not? For several years people have tried to find out who exactly was behind the website Snopes.com. Only recently did they get to the bottom of it. Are you ready for this? It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators scouring public records in Washington, no researchers studying historical stacks in libraries, no team of lawyers reaching a consensus on current caselaw. No, Snopes.com is just a mom-and-pop operation that was started by two people who have absolutely no formal background or experience in investigative research.

David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago. After a few years it began gaining popularity as people believed it to be unbiased and neutral. But over the past couple of years people started asking questions when Snopes was proven wrong in a number of their conclusions. There were also criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues, but rather asserting their beliefs in controversial issues.

In 2008, State Farm agent Bud Gregg hoisted a political sign in Mandeville, Louisiana referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet. The Mikkelson's were quick to "research" this issue and post their condemnation of it on Snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Mr. Gregg into taking down the sign. In fact, nothing of the sort ever took place. A friend of Mr. Gregg personally contacted David Mikkelson to alert him of the factual inacuracy, leaving him Mr. Gregg's contact phone numbers. Mr. Mikkelson was told that Mr. Gregg would give him the phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would inform them that they had never pressured Mr. Gregg to take down his sign.

But the Mikkelson's never called Mr. Gregg. In fact, Mr. Gregg found out that no one from Snopes.com had ever contacted any one with State Farm. Yet, Snopes.com has kept their false story of Mr. Gregg up to this day, as the "final factual word" on the issue.

What is behind Snopes' selfish motivation? A simple review of their "fact-checking" reveals a strong tendency to explain away criticisms towards liberal politicians and public figures while giving conservatives the hatchet job. Religious stories and issues are similarly shown no mercy. With the "main-stream" media quickly losing all credibility with their fawning treatment of President Obama, Snopes is being singled out, along with MSNBC and others, as being particularly biased and agenda-modivated.

So if you really want to know the truth about a story or a rumor you have heard, by all means do not go to Snopes.com! You could do just as well if you were a liberal with an internet connection. Don't go to wikipedia.com either as their team of amateur editors have also been caught in a number of bold-faced liberal-biased untruths. (Such as Wikigate and their religious treatment of Obama.) Take anything these sites say with a grain of salt and an understanding that they are written by people with a motive to criticize all things conservative. Use them only to lead you to solid references where you can read their sources for yourself.

Plus, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that's all the Mikkelson's do.
http://whoisjohngalt.hubpages.com/hub/Snopes-got-Snoped


Busted: Gov't Admits Vaccines Cause Autism

Gov't Admits Vaccines Cause Autism - Mar 31, 2016

"Vaccines are the backbone of the entire pharmaceutical industry. If they can make these children sick from a very early age, they become customers for life." - Dr. Sherri Tenpenny


Official vaccine insert from the FDA web site:

Diphtheria and Tetanus DTaP Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Adsorbed Tripedia

DESCRIPTION
Tripedia®, Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine Adsorbed (DTaP), for intramuscular use, is a sterile preparation of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids adsorbed, with acellular pertussis vaccine in an isotonic sodium chloride solution containing sodium phosphate to control pH. After shaking, the vaccine is a homogeneous white suspension. Tripedia vaccine is distributed by Sanofi Pasteur Inc. '...
...'The physician should inform the parents or guardians about the potential for adverse reactions that have been temporally associated with Tripedia vaccine and other vaccines containing similar components. The health-care provider should provide the Vaccine Information Statements (VISs) that are required by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 to be given with each immunization. Parents or guardians should be instructed to report any adverse reactions to their health-care provider. '...

ADVERSE REACTIONS
Over 3,000 US and 12,000 German infants received one or more doses of Tripedia vaccine as part of the primary immunization series in clinical trials conducted by the sponsor and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). A subset of over 1,000 German and US children were monitored for adverse events through a fourth successive dose of Tripedia vaccine. A subset of 580 German children were monitored for adverse events through a fifth successive dose of Tripedia vaccine.

Pp 11
...'Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting. Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequencies or to establish a causal relationship to components of Tripedia vaccine.2
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM101580.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html

Busted: Gov't Admits Vaccines Cause Autism
Published on Mar 31, 2016
Infowars Reporter Rob Dew shows the government admits that vaccines cause autism and how this news relates to the death of the Bernie Baby and the Censorship of the film Vaxxed.





Here is the infographic shown on the video (Right click out into a new tab to view full sized:

https://grrrgraphics.wordpress.com/2016/03/31/citizen-cattle-featured-on-info-wars-video-govt-admits-vaccines-cause-autism/