Showing posts with label Black Box Warning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Black Box Warning. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 7, 2020

The Vitamin K Shot and Hepatitis B Vaccine Kills 4-Day Old Infant

The Vitamin K Shot and Hepatitis B Vaccine Kills 4-Day Old Infant

https://www.stopmandatoryvaccination.com/parent/vaccine-injury/the-vitamin-k-shot-and-hepatitis-b-vaccine-kills-4-day-old-infant/



-


"Years years ago when I still worked in nursing and the newborn Nursery was my first you had to put in like six months in the newborn Nursery before you could work in other places in the hospital I used s a l i n e"  ~DM

-

How many times do we have to say to have your babies at home?!


Monday, November 25, 2019

Vitamin K Warning From Tom Mc Lachlan . . . .

Vit K From Tom Mc Lachlan . . . .

"You know what “synthetic vitamin K” enthusiasts don’t understand? The thought that babies (and all animals for that matter) have lower levels of vitamin K at birth for a beneficial, protective, reason. I’m just going to throw these “common sense-based” thoughts out there but let’s consider them:
and BTW this goes for the Drops as well as the Shot

First, in order to absorb vitamin K we have to have a functioning biliary and pancreas system. Your infant’s digestive system isn’t fully developed at birth which is why we give babies breast milk (and delay solids) until they are at least 6-months-old, and why breast milk only contains a small amount of highly absorbable vitamin K. Too much vitamin K could tax the liver and cause brain damage (among other things). As baby ages and the digestive tract, mucosal lining, gut flora, and enzyme functions develop, baby can process more vitamin K. Low levels of vitamin K at birth just…makes…sense. ???

Secondly, cord blood contains stem cells, which protect a baby against bleeding and perform all sorts of needed repairs inside an infant’s body. Here’s the kicker, in order for a baby to get this protective boost of stem cells, cord-cutting needs to be delayed and the blood needs to remain thin so stem cells can easily travel and perform their functions. Imagine that, baby has his/her own protective mechanism to prevent bleeding and repair organs…that wasn’t discovered until after we started routinely giving infants vitamin K injections.

Third, a newborn might have low levels of vitamin K because it’s intestines are not yet colonized with bacteria needed to synthesize it and the “vitamin K cycle” isn’t fully functional in newborns. It makes sense then to bypass the gut and inject vitamin K right into the muscle right? Except baby’s kidneys aren’t fully functional either.

Fourth, babies are born with low levels of vitamin K compared to adults, but this level is still sufficient to prevent problems; vitamin K prophylaxis isn’t necessarily needed.

Finally, several clinical observations support the hypothesis that children have natural protective mechanisms that justify their low vitamin K levels at birth . I don’t know about you, but we should probably figure out why that is before we “inject now and worry about it later.”

Do you know why vitamin K is pushed on parents and their children? Because pharmaceutical companies don’t like to lose money, doctors don’t like to be questioned, the American Academy of Pediatrics dare not change its recommendations."

"Since 1985, the medical profession has known that oral vitamin K raises blood levels 300 - 9,000 times higher. The injectable vitamin K, results in vitamin K levels 9,000 times thicker than adults blood.

Baby's blood thickened with vitamin K, causes a situation where stem cells have to move through sludge, not nicely greased blood vessels full of blood which can allow stem cells easy acess to anywhere. Maybe one day it will dawn on the medical profession that not only are cord blood stem cells important and useful to the newborn baby, but that stem cells need to thin blood for a reason."

"Any fetus which gets being wrung out like a wet towel while travelling down a narrow drain pipe, can incur damage in any part of the body, including in the brain, and needs an in-built fix-it. And stem cells cross the brain blood barrier. In fact, stem cells can go ... anywhere!!! Amazing don't you think. God's design has solutions for situational problems. Three solutions, actually. The second is the fact that naturally, in the first few days, a baby's blood clotting factors are lower than normal.

But ... pediatricians consider this a ... "defect" ... so want to give vitamin K which results in blood nearly 100 times thicker than an adult's. This vitamin K injection, so they say ... (like they say immediate cord clamping is safe, and normal, and delayed cord clamping is an unproven intervention) ... is because the baby wasn't designed right, and if you don't give a vitamin K injection, the baby "could bleed to death".

It's not for nothing that the vitamin K syringe, sits right alongside that cord clamp and the scissors!

But there is an unanswered question:
"Why are blood clotting factors in babies low in the first few days after birth? Why has a baby got much thinner blood as a result?"

Might a logical hypothesis be, that thinner blood allows freer and quicker access of cord blood stem cells to any part of the body damaged during birth? After all, why should stem cells have to fight through a baby's blood which is now 100 times thicker than any adult's, courtesy of another needle?"

-

In the US injections begin the day a baby is born...

The Hep B vaccine given on the first day of life has been linked to autoimmune disorders, autism, Bell's palsy, multiple sclerosis,convulsions and brain disorders,anaphylactic shock and death.

The Vit K shot also given on the first day of life comes with a black box warning of death. That is the most serious warning a pharmaceutical can have.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/07/07/60-things-that-can-go-terribly-wrong-with-hepatitis-b-vaccination.aspx

https://www.learntherisk.org/vitamink/


Black Box Warning:



-

WARNING - INTRAVENOUS AND INTRAMUSCULAR USE

Severe reactions, including fatalities, have occurred during and immediately after INTRAVENOUS injection of AquaMEPHYTON* (Phytonadione), even when precautions have been taken to dilute the AquaMEPHYTON and to avoid rapid infusion. Severe reactions, including fatalities, have also been reported following INTRAMUSCULAR administration. Typically these severe reactions have resembled hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis, including shock and cardiac and/or respiratory arrest. Some patients have exhibited these severe reactions on receiving AquaMEPHYTON for the first time. Therefore the INTRAVENOUS and INTRAMUSCULAR routes should be restricted to those situations where the subcutaneous route is not feasible and the serious risk involved is considered justified.


https://ashley-everly.s3.amazonaws.com/vaccine-inserts/vitamin-k/aquamephyton/doc.pdf

-


Friday, November 16, 2018

Vitamin K Shot As A Masked Cover-up For Hepatitis B Vaccine Damage At Birth

Compiled by Janie Wagner...

Vitamin K shot at birth is essentially used as a SYNTHETIC blood clotter. It masks invisible brain damage from the HepB shot. It’s made from the same Coal-Tar in Moth-Balls which are lethal, as explained by Allison Jones who has been researching vaccines for 39 years.
https://youtu.be/6LUVEI7IjHw


.
Vit. K shot has a black box warning for being a very significant risk and may be fatal. www.drugs.com/pro/vitamin-k1.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxed_warning
https://www.khoahoc.mobi/tags/vitamin-k-black-box-warning-2741347.html
.
Study shows CHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA RISK from Vit K shot.
https://www.bmj.com/content/305/6849/341
PDF:  https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/305/6849/341.full.pdf
.
Other reasons why vitamin K shots at birth are not safe:
http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/the-high-risks-of-vitamin-k-shot-for-your-newborn-baby/
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/03/27/high-risks-to-your-baby-from-vitamin-k-shot-they-dont-warn-you-about.aspx
.
"The blood of the innocents": The ‘benefit’ of K shots can be traced all the way to the bank.
http://www.vaccination.inoz.com/VitaminK.html
.
Legal limitations (do word search for "vitamin K").
http://legaljustice4john.com/jaundiceVitKshotNewborns.htm
.
"Synthetic Vitamin K Shot for my Baby? No Thanks."
https://www.livingwhole.org/synthetic-vitamin-k-shot/
.
Pediatrician writes: “This goes for the Drops as well as the Shot: Babies naturally have LOWER vitamin K level at birth for their own protection and for these other common-sense reasons…”
https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/data/vicpmonthlyreporttemplate5_1_17.pdf

-

Bullying:

Vaccination Information Network (VINE)

This is how it's done!

From an anti vaccine group (not me, not my cousin):

"My cousin is in labor and she’s being bullied by hospital staff!

Here’s what happened!

Update: Nurse comes back in. Sees vitamin refusal form still not signed. Starts with "By law you have to sign this. If you don't will give your baby vitamin K"

I laughed and said "I do NOT GIVE YOU PERMISSION TO TREAT MY BABY AND IF YOU DO I WILL SUE THIS HOSPITAL! It is not a state or federal law"

she interrupts "Yes it is"

I interrupt " Then bring me the STATE LEGAL PAPER WORK STATING THAT I HAVE TO SIGN THIS"

"Ok I will. I'll send someone into talk to you."

Me "Ok that's fine. Have them bring the unopened vitamin K box too."

she leaves.

3 nurses come in

(lol)

"Do you need anything?"

Me "Yes, a new nurse. The one that was just in here threatened to inject my baby without my permission if I didn't sign the refusal form."

Nurse "well it's just a form stating you're declining the vitamin K shot."

Me "No it's not. You see right here where it says I understand by not giving my child this they can have brain damage and bleed out. That's called medical neglect. You see here where it says I been fully informed. Nope I haven't don't see a full list of side or ingredients. By admitting medical neglect that gives CPS ground for a warrant and to open a case. Then they can vaccinate my child. And they give them all at once which can kill my child. I will NOT sign this."

Nurses jaw dropped "CPS can use this?"

Me "Yep" pulled up cases. While pulling up cases I asked "Have you read the vaccine insert?"

Nurse "Yes"

Me "Good. Can you tell me the ingredients?"

Nurse "Off the top of my head? No"

Me "Mmmhhh. Bring me the unopened vitamin K box."

Nurse "Ok. We'll just take this form and put it in your file unsigned"

Me "Ok. Thank you."

They left. Form unsigned.

I turned to my oldest "Do you see now why an education is so important?"

BOOM

TRUTH BOMB!"

I think the word is supposed to be Vial, but this vial of poison is vile.
Okay, moving on...

-

Black Box Warning:

If the Vitamin K shot is just a vitamin...why does it come with a black box warning? That's the strongest warning the FDA has. ðŸ¤” ~ Chris Kirckof

Technically, Vitamin K is misclassified as a vaccine, which is incorrect.  It's a shot, yes, but no vaccine.

-



-

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=241884052916692&id=232581190513645

-

Gabby DeVelbiss
December 5, 2015 near Modesto, CA ·

Interesting points made about Vitamin K at birth by a brilliant pediatrician who remains anonymous:

"You know what “synthetic vitamin K” enthusiasts don’t understand? The thought that babies (and all animals for that matter) have lower levels of vitamin K at birth for a beneficial, protective, reason. I’m just going to throw these “common sense-based” thoughts out there but let’s consider them:

and BTW this goes for the Drops as well as the Shot

First, in order to absorb vitamin K we have to have a functioning biliary and pancreas system. Your infant’s digestive system isn’t fully developed at birth which is why we give babies breast milk (and delay solids) until they are at least 6-months-old, and why breast milk only contains a small amount of highly absorbable vitamin K. Too much vitamin K could tax the liver and cause brain damage (among other things). As baby ages and the digestive tract, mucosal lining, gut flora, and enzyme functions develop, baby can process more vitamin K. Low levels of vitamin K at birth just…makes…sense. ???

Secondly, cord blood contains stem cells, which protect a baby against bleeding and perform all sorts of needed repairs inside an infant’s body. Here’s the kicker, in order for a baby to get this protective boost of stem cells, cord-cutting needs to be delayed and the blood needs to remain thin so stem cells can easily travel and perform their functions. Imagine that, baby has his/her own protective mechanism to prevent bleeding and repair organs…that wasn’t discovered until after we started routinely giving infants vitamin K injections.

Third, a newborn might have low levels of vitamin K because it’s intestines are not yet colonized with bacteria needed to synthesize it and the “vitamin K cycle” isn’t fully functional in newborns. It makes sense then to bypass the gut and inject vitamin K right into the muscle right? Except baby’s kidneys aren’t fully functional either.

Fourth, babies are born with low levels of vitamin K compared to adults, but this level is still sufficient to prevent problems; vitamin K prophylaxis isn’t necessarily needed.

Finally, several clinical observations support the hypothesis that children have natural protective mechanisms that justify their low vitamin K levels at birth . I don’t know about you, but we should probably figure out why that is before we “inject now and worry about it later.”

Do you know why vitamin K is pushed on parents and their children? Because pharmaceutical companies don’t like to lose money, doctors don’t like to be questioned, the American Academy of Pediatrics dare not change its recommendations."

"Since 1985, the medical profession has known that oral vitamin K raises blood levels 300 - 9,000 times higher. The injectable vitamin K, results in vitamin K levels 9,000 times thicker than adults blood.

Baby's blood thickened with vitamin K, causes a situation where stem cells have to move through sludge, not nicely greased blood vessels full of blood which can allow stem cells easy acess to anywhere. Maybe one day it will dawn on the medical profession that not only are cord blood stem cells important and useful to the newborn baby, but that stem cells need to thin blood for a reason."

"Any fetus which gets being wrung out like a wet towel while travelling down a narrow drain pipe, can incur damage in any part of the body, including in the brain, and needs an in-built fix-it. And stem cells cross the brain blood barrier. In fact, stem cells can go ... anywhere!!! Amazing don't you think. God's design has solutions for situational problems. Three solutions, actually. The second is the fact that naturally, in the first few days, a baby's blood clotting factors are lower than normal.

But ... pediatricians consider this a ... "defect" ... so want to give vitamin K which results in blood nearly 100 times thicker than an adult's. This vitamin K injection, so they say ... (like they say immediate cord clamping is safe, and normal, and delayed cord clamping is an unproven intervention) ... is because the baby wasn't designed right, and if you don't give a vitamin K injection, the baby "could bleed to death".

It's not for nothing that the vitamin K syringe, sits right alongside that cord clamp and the scissors!

But there is an unanswered question:

"Why are blood clotting factors in babies low in the first few days after birth? Why has a baby got much thinner blood as a result?"

Might a logical hypothesis be, that thinner blood allows freer and quicker access of cord blood stem cells to any part of the body damaged during birth? After all, why should stem cells have to fight through a baby's blood which is now 100 times thicker than any adult's, courtesy of another needle?"



The SOLUTION:

HAVE YOUR CHILDREN AT HOME.  And tell the midwives, NO SHOTS, NO VACCINES!, etc..

Or, better yet, stop reproducing, and spare a poor soul from a life of suffering.

-

Monday, October 2, 2017

Information about The Vitamin K shot being linked to leukemia

Another one that the overzealous bastards want to jab into newborns as soon as they exit the womb.


Information about The Vitamin K shot being linked to leukemia.




"The Vitamin K shot has been linked to leukaemia, including acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, which is characterized by an increased number of white corpuscles in the blood, and accounts for about 85 percent of childhood leukaemia. Research carried out by Dr. Louise Parker, of the Sir James Spence Institute of Child Health in Newcastle upon Tyne, produced the most startling results. Dr. Louise
Parker was quoted in the British Medical Journal in 1998 as stating, "It is not possible, on the basis of currently published evidence, to refute the suggestion that neonatal IM vitamin K
administration increases the risk of early childhood leukemia.".
The British Journal of Cancer published "Factors associated with childhood cancer" by J. Golding, et al, in 1990. The report indicated that universally administered IM vitamin K injections significantly increase our children's chances of developing childhood cancer.

A follow-up study published two years later in the British Medical Journal (Golding J, Paterson K, Greenwood R, Mott M. Intramuscular vitamin K and childhood cancer. BMJ 1992; 305:341-346.) reinforced the findings of the previous study. The authors' comments, in keeping with scientific style, are conservatively stated, but parents who are concerned about the health of their babies will read "danger" between the following lines: "The only two studies so far to have examined
the relation between childhood cancer and intramuscular vitamin K have shown similar results and the relation is biologically plausible. The prophylactic benefits against haemorrhagic disease are unlikely to exceed the potential adverse effects from intramuscular
vitamin K..."

The chance of your child developing leukaemia from the Vitamin K shot
is estimated to be about one in 500 (MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, Vol 2 #3, September 1992)

Animal studies have linked large doses of vitamin K to a variety of conditions that include anaemia, liver damage, kidney damage and death.

Interestingly the common problem that occurs these days of jaundice in newborns has only been reported since the introduction of Vitamin K administration.

According to the product insert, adverse reactions include haemolysis (or hemolysis - American spelling) (meaning breakdown of red blood cells), haemolytic anaemia (a disorder characterised by chronic premature destruction of red blood cells), hyperbilirubinemia (too much bilirubin in blood) and jaundice (yellow skin and eyes resulting from hyperbilirubinemia), and allergic reactions include face flushing, gastrointestinal upset, rash, redness, pain or swelling at injection site and itching skin. It also warns that large enough doses can cause brain damage in infants and/or impairment to liver function. Hypoxia has also been published as having occurred in infants after Vitamin K administration.


Vitamin K Shot Black Box Warning:


https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2003/012223Orig1s039Lbl.pdf




-----


Thursday, March 30, 2017

Vitamin K Warning

Shared from Kayla Balas

True Story: A friend of mine just had a baby via emergency c-section and is currently still in the hospital recovering while her baby is in the NICU.

This mother has been through more than any human being could ever imagine having to go through over a lifetime and is still one of the sweetest, strongest women.

She chose to decline the vitamin K shot for her baby because as you can see from the package insert there are clear warnings and because the hospital she is in couldn't pressure her into changing her mind, they then called CPS on her.




Yes, you read that right. CPS was called on her for declining something she has every legal right to decline and every logical reason to decline.

Thankfully another friend of mine, Erin Crawford, was able to be at the hospital when the hospital social worker came in. And ya know what? The hospital was scared of the facts Erin was presenting. So much so.. they brought in the head of nursing, the attending physician, and the hospital administrator to the room to discuss what she was presenting to them.

After 40 minutes of talking to them, the head of nursing and the attending physician ADMITTED they had no idea the Vit K shot has a black box warning (strictest warning put on the labeling of drugs by the FDA when there is reasonable evidence of an association of a serious hazard.)

The hospital lawyer ADMITTED the consent and refusal forms that are given to patients when declining said drugs do not fully inform the patient and are illegal, apologized profusely and promised to revise the forms.

They then could do nothing else but promise to leave this poor mother alone.. which is great! But this shouldn't have happened to begin with and it happens ALL the time.

First of all, why is CPS being called on parents for no reason other than harassment?

Second of all, why didn't the doctor and nurse know that the Vit K shot they were not only recommending but harassing a patient into giving her newborn baby... has a black box warning? Shouldn't doctors know every detail about every drug they prescribe?

Thirdly, why is the hospital giving consent and refusal forms that do not adequately inform patients to the risks associated with every drug they are consenting to?

Fourthly, why is the Vit K shot being given to EVERY SINGLE newborn baby when it clearly states on the package insert that it should only be given when the serious risk involved is considered justified?

Some info to consider about Vit K:

"In order to absorb vitamin K we have to have a functioning biliary and pancreas system. The reason we give breastmilk (and delay solids) until they are atleast 6 months, and the reason breastmilk only contains a small amount of highly absorbable Vit K, is because infants digestive systems are not fully developed at birth and too much Vit K could harm the liver and cause brain damage. As baby ages and the digestive tract, mucosal lining, gut flora, and enzyme functions develop, baby can process more Vit K. So it makes sense that they have low levels of Vit K at birth. (and we don't need to inject them with a high amount of synthetic Vit K.)

Cord blood contains stem cells, which protect a baby against bleeding and perform all sorts of needed repairs inside an infants body. In order for a baby to get this protective boost of stem cells, cord-cutting needs to be delayed and the blood needs to remain thin so stem cells can easily travel and perform their functions.

Babies are born with low levels of Vit K compared to adults, but this level is still sufficient to prevent problems.

Several clinical observations support the hypothesis that children have natural protective mechanisms that justify their low vitamin K levels at birth. I don't know about you, but we should probably figure out why that is before we inject now and worry about it later.

Do you know why Vit K is pushed on parents and their children? Because pharmaceutical companies don't like to lose money, doctors don't like to be questioned, the American Academy of Pediatrics dare not change its recommendations." -Pediatrician

Edited to note: For those of you questioning whether VIT K is administered subcutaneously or intramuscularly, it was confirmed by the doctors at this hospital as well as birth professionals in the comments on this post that standard practice is intramuscular.

-----