Looks to me like they are still trying to win the 'choice' argument. That strategy wasn't designed to win. It was always meant to be the controlled opposition.Best,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 9:49 AM, 'tim bolen' firstname.lastname@example.org [Vaccination-Liberation] Vaccination-Liberation@... wrote:
Unless strategies and tactics by the No on SB277 go through an immediate change in California SB277 is going to be the law.
Frankly, I don’tthink they will change. The people in California are locked into a losing strategy. So, be prepared for the loss.
Here is what I said:
Autism Leadership Council
Ive been in California a VERY long time. Ive watched California politics on health care. Here, the Health Freedom Movement thrives. Every one of our practitioners is protected. The State is wide open for excellent health care.
So, tell me How in the F*** did you lose SB277 in the Senate Health committee? Do people in the autism world not know where Sacramento is? It is the State capital. Its right there where it has always been.
There, in Sacramento, there is this thing called the State Legislature.They author and vote on bills. SB277 was, and is, a bill that the State Legislature is looking at so the people you need to talk to are going to be in Sacramento. Look it up on a map.
This isnt rocket science. Its politics and politics isnt being namby-pamby nice, and smiling softly to a staffer.
The No on SB277 strategies and tactics Ive been watching, from the sidelines, are seventy years old, out of the Jimmy Stewart Mr Smith goes to Washington movie. They didnt work in real life then, and they certainly dont work now.
Wake the fuck up people
Having the members of the State legislature like you is NOT a factor. It plays NO PART in the argument. This is politics. There are books on this process you could read.
The California strategy team (snort here) was given information on how much money was given to each member of each committee by MERCK, just recently, that will review SB277 and decided to hide it and NOT make it an issue.
Im beginning to think the California campaign is being run by Health Choice. Are Ken and Barbie about to show up in the Barbie Yacht on the Sacramento River hosting a yacht party for only $5,000 per attendee? Will there be photo opportunities with the bills authors?
There are TWO more committees, people. Put down the lolly-pops and get out the napalm
You need to win.
Home Schoolers will also lose the exemptions...
There will be no religious exemption in California and as Dr. Sears stated, medical exemptions will not be easy to obtain without an obvious previous vaccine injury that has to be signed by a licensed MD. So trying to keep your unvaccinated child free from being injured, even though the parents may have suffered vaccine injuries, predisposing their children to vaccine injury, they will not be able to find a doctor who will give them a medical exemption for their child. If this passes, there will be floods of people leaving California, no doubt. We suggest that if you live in California, you forget the right to 'choose' angle and instead focus on liability and the 3 Merck/MMR whistleblowers -- sending well written emails and letters to all the people on the Education committee. It seems like not a one of them is familiar with the 10 facts that Al put together here http://www.pamv.info/
Most folks don't understand that the public health department, the CDC and the state are all corporations. Basically Our Government is a Corporation. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is a corporation headquartered in the STATE OF GEORGIA. The CDC IS NOT PART OF A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT. Repeat: the CDC IS NOT PART OF A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT! It is a private for-profit corporation that is chartered under the umbrella of the private for-profit UNITED STATES corporation with extremely close ties to the pharmaceutical companies. I do not recognize the CDC as a government health advocacy organization. It is a corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet and headquartered in the STATE OF GEORGIA, with strong ties to the pharmaceutical industry. Therefore, their recommendations are influenced by the 'fiscal' health of their corporation. [See: Our Government is a Company, the Clearfield Doctrine and The Great American Adventure - Secrets of America by Judge Dale
With this level of ignorance in the Senate and other proponents of SB 277, we need to teach more people about using a Vaccination Notice -- since it raises these issues and forces the liability issue. Scroll down to STEP 2 The Vaccination Notice.
If this does pass, there will be a mass exodus into our state...we already have too many Californians moving here... Following are the four points that I sent to someone else -- points that the Senate H&W Committee members seemed to be completely unaware of.
1) THREE Merck (MMR) whistleblowers See http://ww.vaclib.org/news/CDCwhistleblower.htm
2) The lack of credible science justifying vaccines. There is quite a debate on the 'lack of' real science behind the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' recomendations for Vaccines for Children (VFC). David L. Lewis, PhD, worked for the EPA and CDC for over 30 years and details this problem in his book, Science for Sale: How the US Government Uses Powerful Corporations and Leading Universities to Support Government Policies, Silence Top Scientists, Jeopardize Our Health, and Protect Corporate Profits.
3) the MYTH of herd immunity. See http://ww.vaclib.org/links/herdimmunity.htm, and
4) the biggest issue of all -- the fact that ALL players in the vaccine scam are released of liability for the harm the vaccines are known to cause.